24 May 2012
HOME
Natural Remedies
"Bacterial/Viral Coinfections";
TLR2 (fungi)Signaling Depletes IRAK1 and Inhibits Induction of Type 1 by TLR7/9 (viruses)-- -CV Harding, 2012 (More in the chart at the bottom of this homepage)
"Multiple Mechanisms of Immune Suppression by B Lymphocytes" (New and Trashes Yale and IDSA)
NIH's Treatment Recommendations for Chronic Active Epstein-Borreliosis, the chronic illness also induced by OspA vaccination or exposure to molds.
ELISA = arbitrary cutoff.
Disclaimer
1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow Saddam for the oil.
Bush/Gore Oil/War-(Oct,2000)
Bush's own explainer (Oct
2000) re:
Iraq Oil
See also, the "6 hour Lyme dissemination after a tick-bite" article published by the Forschners. because that's what made Durland Fish go utterly ballistic as you can see in this email exchange (below) between Fish and Edward McSweegan at the NIH.
Yale's Durland Fish was also caught with a hit list (Hartford Courant) See also GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm , SWEEG_STALKING.html, and McSweegan.htm for more interesting harassment and stalking information.
Says Yale's Durland Fish to Crazy Eddie McSweegan:
"Want to send her a bogus article?""I need more than rumors to attack."
"We did lose the railroad case...."
(Check out the email addresses and the dates...)
SEE MORE ABOUT THESE WIRETAPPERS, STALKERS, AND HARASSERS, HERE
'Says Yale's Durland Fish to NIH's Edward McSweegan (below) in his "Conspiracy to Defraud" the public around the issue of whether we should be treated upon tick attachment. ( Scroll down to see the actual email between Yale's Durland Fish and NIH's Ed McSweegan, especially as regards sending the Lyme Disease Foundation ( http://www.lyme.org ) "a bogus article." )
Ed McSweegan wiretapping the Lyme Foundation and calling it "clairvoyance."
"McSweegan nonetheless continued his campaign against the Forschners and LDF, which included Internet postings, e-mails, and anonymous mailings criticizing the Forschners and their foundation." McSweegan_Relentless.htm
Durland Fish and Ed McSweegan didn't want it known that people should be treated upon tick attachment. 2 out of 3 people who get the Lyme rash already have the spirochete in their central nervous system and all borrelioses are permanent brain infections (therefore it is too late to treat). Dattwyler_Luft: Bb DNA in CSF, with EM
Treatment on tick bite, if that was the standard procedure at the time, would have interfered with the vaccine trials, and then no one would know if the vaccine or the antibiotic prevented Lyme. So they simply did not want anyone being treated on tick bite- and they did not explain why, or the dangers. Now, treatment on tick bite is standard.
Also copied below is Allen Steere lying to insurance companies at the 1992, 101st meeting of "Insurance Medicine."
What Steere told these people is the opposite of what is true, and the opposite of what he himself published and not what the CDC published as serodiagnosis. IgM is diagnostic of current infection and all IgM bands should be reported. You can see that that is the opposite of what he informed "Insurance Medicine" Steere_The_Original_Serodiagnosis_expanding_range_of_IgM
The current way to diagnose Lyme, the CDC's method is completely false. Never use an ELISA, and look for IgM bands rather than IgG. Dearborn (spincity) "Conference"; (not a consensus): http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00038469.htm
NOTE WHERE STEERE'S STATEMENT HERE DOES NOT JIVE WITH HIS ORIGINAL SERODIAGNOSTIC
STANDARD:Steere's orginal blood test standard where changing and expanding IgM and IgG were diagnostic of curernt infection with this relapsing fever organism.
