Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.frii.net!easynews!cyclone.swbell.net!typhoon.snet.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3A7FC907.2F07@snet.net>
From: Kathleen <kathleen.dick...@snet.net>
Reply-To: kathleen.dick...@snet.net
Organization: SeCT Lyme Support Group
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-SNET  (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Subject: Re: Submitted to FDA with supporting documentation
References: <981430538.3a7f710aaee36@webmail.cotse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 72
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 04:51:03 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.252.202.51
X-Complaints-To: abuse@snet.net
X-Trace: typhoon.snet.net 981457351 64.252.202.51 (Tue, 06 Feb 2001 06:02:31 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 06:02:31 EST

nadie-no-s...@cotse.com wrote:
> 
> >From: "Jonathan R. Strong" <jstr...@home.com>
> >Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
> >Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 12:34 AM
> >Subject: Re: Submitted to FDA with supporting documentation, Jan 31, 2001,
> Bethesda
> >
> 
> > "Kathleen" wrote:
> > > I actually gave this presentation
> > > with slides... as much of it as I
> > > could say in 5-7 minutes.
> > > So it is part of the record, now.
> > >> snip <<
> >
> > K
> >
> > This is great -and the fact that you managed to get the salient points
> >organized and presented
> >is fantastic. So many of us are aware of the issues, know of the
> >injustices and want to make a
> >difference but get mired down in lyme malaise - but *you* actually got it
> >together and
> >delivered it in a way that can make a difference. Bravo - and thanks.
> >
> >
> Actually, it wasn't great.  It was a rambling, buzzsaw critique of the
> Dressler serodiagnostic criteria, with washed out, illegible
> black-and-white overheads.  

They would not let me use
a Power Point presentation.
We had one,  I asked.  They
said they couldn't.

Worse, it had nothing to do with the topic of
> the meeting which was a "Lyme Disease Vaccine Safety Update."  I think the
> only thing it accomplished was to remind the audience that 1) easy access to
> scientific and medical information is no substitute for real knowledge and
> 2) "some of these people are nuts."
> 
> It wasn't helped that this off-topic diatribe was preceded by Karen
> Forschner's awkward wiggling between the fact of her taking $120,000 from
> SKB and having to admit she didn't take the vaccine herself or give it to
> her kid, followed by a lawyer disingenuously asking the Committee to suspend
> vaccine usage and thereby strengthening his case against SKB.
> 
> Almost lost in this theater of bad one-act plays was the small but
> interesting number of personal stories about adverse events that seemed to
> follow the second Lymerix shot.  Maybe second shot events are a common
> factor and will be looked at in greater detail.
> --
> --


I just want to make sure the whole world
knows that Ed was at this meeting.

So, this can only be Ed.

And I was not wrong about a thing I said.
And no one here expected that you would say
anything other than what you just did.

You can't prove me wrong, because I am not.

So that's why you come up with this subjective
garbage, you hateful son of a bitch.

Kathleen

Google Home - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs, Press, & Help

©2006 Google