To:
Donald Browne, Executive Director,
Judicial Review Council
505
Hudson Street, PO Box 26009, Harttford,
CT 06126-0099
To: The Child Advocates, Jeanne
Milstein & Mickey Kramer
28-20
Trinity Street, Hartford, CT, 06106
To: Terry Jordan, West Broad
Street School, Pawcatuck, CT 06379
To:
Naugatuck Schools (I have
to copy them all in since Don Dickson
would not tell me where the kids will be
enrolled. Similar to the DCF
transferring me to a dead phone line
every time I try to call to arrange a
“supervised visit”.)
To: Christopher Morano, Justice
Commission, Office of Public
Integrity, 300 Corporate Place, Rocky
Hill, 06067
CC:
Martha Stone & Children’s Rights.org and
Uconn Law, 55 Elizabeth Street,
06105-2290,
Children’s Rughts.org 404 Park Avenue
South, 11th Floor, New York,
NY 10016, UN High
Commissioner on Human Rights Geneve, UN
High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneve,
Michael
McDowell, EU, IRE, DOJ, Dublin,
Interpol, Lyon, France,
ohn Ashcroft,
USDOJ, Kevin O’Connor, USDOJ,
Pekah Wallace, CHRO,
AGs Blumenthal and
Ryan,
Chief of Police Clisham,
Naugatuck,
Brian
Fallon, MD,
www.Columbia-Lyme.org, New
York State Psychiatric Institute,
Consulate of Ireland,
New York,
James Phillips, Milford,
CT, Hartford Courant.,
Mary E. Hanacek,
Milford, CT,
www.ICSPP.org, The Sidran Institute, 200
E. Joppa Road, Suite 207, Towson, MD
21286 USA
From:
Kathleen M. Dickson, 23 Garden Street,
Pawcatuck, CT 06379, 860-599-3852
www.ActionLyme.com
Re:
Diane, David and Lara Dickson, who are
now “safe” with Donald Dickson
January
6, 2004
UPDATE
“HELP” from the “Mental Health” System
in The Corruption State
Greetings Again,
Surely
you have seen the recent news
Hartford
Courant: Sunday, January, 4
2004
Chaos, Distrust At The State Capitol
”Connecticut has seldom, if ever,
greeted the dawn of a new year with such
chaos in state government.
Gov. John G. Rowland has lost the trust
of much of the public for lying about
gifts from favor-seekers
and
because key figures in his
administration either have been found
guilty of crimes or are under grand
jury
investigation.
Never has there been this much
corruption or suggestion of it so close
to the governor's office. …
Protecting Children
That one of the wealthiest states can't
adequately manage its young charges -
from juvenile justice to mental
health -
is indefensible. For a while, it seemed
as if the Department of Children and
Families belonged to the
scandal-a-week club. Let's make 2004 the
year that DCF climbs out of the hole and
works itself out of de facto
federal
receivership.
Straighten out the mess at the
Connecticut Juvenile Training Center in
Middletown, where, despite spending
$325,000
a year per child, there's little proof
that programs work. Continue to create
beds for troubled girls
so they
are not locked in mental hospitals,
taking up beds needed by other children
lying in emergency rooms.
Shorten
the adoption period for foster children.
At four years, it is twice the national
average.
D. Ray Sirry, the czar appointed by the
federal court to monitor DCF
improvements, asked the operative
question: Wouldn't it be great if DCF
were seen as the agency that helps
children and families
rather than
the agency that takes children away?”
The DCF
has been nearly taken over by the
Federal Government, and the reason
indeed having been linked to
Rowland,
Ellef, Alibozek, and the Tomassso’s.
What I didn’t know, but had suspected,
and reported on my
website
http://www.actionlyme.com/BRAINLESS_BUREAUCRATS.htm
Milstein [The Child Advocate] sues DCF over agency's treatment of abused child,
Associated Press, December 18 2003
“Milstein accused DCF of "callous and reckless indifference" in caring for the youth, and she suspects other children
might be suffering because of the agency's missteps.
DCF's "actions and omissions were so egregious as to violate this young man's constitutional and statutory rights," Milstein s
aid Wednesday. "It is now my office's moral, ethical and legal responsibility to pursue legal remedy for this boy."
"Tragically, this case is not isolated," Milstein said. "There are over 6,000 Connecticut children in out-of-home care. I am
gravely concerned that many other children are suffering the same callous and reckless indifference to their
safety and rights that DCF has shown Boy Doe. I am convinced that the department lacks the essential
understanding of the effects of trauma on children."
================
And as
was also revealed this Sunday in the
Courant:
Complicated man, big dreamer, at center
of federal probe
January
5, 2004 , Associated Press
HARTFORD, Conn. -- Peter Ellef was a big
dreamer.
”As Gov. John G. Rowland's co-chief
of staff, Ellef spoke of levitating
trains, hydroponics gardening,
building prisons in old stone quarries
and opening trade relations with China. His plans after state
service
included developing a string of juvenile
detention facilities across the
country, a chain
of home improvement
stores and a high-end garden center.”
- - - -
- - - - - -
And from
Bill Curry, who ran against Rowland in
2002:
By DAN HAAR, December 21 2003
“COURANT: Shortly after Enron, you talked about management at the state ***** Department of Children and
Families *****, you talked about no-bid contracts, you talked about pay for play and you talked about Rowland's
general management of his office. All four of those things which we now, in the light of the investigations and in light
of the plea of [former Deputy Chief of Staff] Larry Alibozek, we now think of as being related. They were not then
thought of as being related. Why not?
CURRY:(Long pause) First of all, some people thought they were related. Rowland's numbers, the public began to
get a sense of who Rowland was. It's hard to plow through all the facts.
Weeks before that election, investigative work that I and my staff did documented the bid-rigging and the overcharges
by the governor's favorite donors for which Mr. Ellef and Mr. [William] Tomasso now face almost certain indictment,
for which Mr. Alibozek has already pleaded guilty. We had all the projects, all the bids, all the overcharges.
That was your press conference on Sept. 24.
Yeah. The governor's closest staff, in all likelihood, will be marched en masse off to prison. And after we had
disclosed all of this, not a single newspaper wrote an editorial criticizing it. And in your own paper it appeared,
I believe, in the front page of the second section.
- - - -
- - - - - - - - -
The New
Haven Advocate, during the Rowland/Curry
Gubernatorial Race
http://old.newhavenadvocate.com/articles/currycrusade.html
….
“Now
Rowland makes his pitch. He segues into
a rap about neglected children. In the
TV debate the night
before,
he failed to answer Curry's attacks
about unending horror stories of abused
and endangered children
in the care of Rowland's Department of
Children and Families,
or DCF.
"I keep
hearing from the press," he continues,
"'It's DCF. It's DCF's chief.' Baloney.
It's our
responsibility
as parents, as community
leaders. To have a loving adult in the
life of a child. That is the
solution."
Become a mentor or a coach,
he says.--- Says Rowland
Then
Curry declares that under John Rowland,
child poverty has risen, even during a
boom. The middle
class is stretched. Curry made the same
point in his best moment of the first
two debates.
"Our
parents lifted the elderly out of
poverty. Our generation, in easier
times, is letting children slide
into
poverty. We'll be remembered for that
accomplishment."
"The system is corrupt. Our entire
political system at the top is
mortgaged to special interests. The
governor
is a poster boy for the takeover of the
public sphere by special interests."
- - - -
- - - - - - -
We’ve
got a modern Trevellian on our hands.
And it’s worse than we thought:
Ellef
(again)
Complicated man, big dreamer, at center
of federal probe
January
5, 2004, Associated Press
HARTFORD, Conn. -- Peter Ellef was a big
dreamer.
“Ellef
worked for Cigna Corp. in Bloomfield,
holding a number of management positions
between 1972 to
1995,
when he became Rowland's economic
development commissioner.
For 18 of his years at Cigna, Ellef
worked with Alibozek. He took Alibozek
with him when he went to the
Department of Economic and Community
Development; Ellef later hired Alibozek
as his deputy chief of staff.”
As many
of you may or may not know, I named
Rowland in this RICO complaint as
regards Lyme disease for
the
reason that it altogether appeared, and
then I discovered for sure, many
elements of the management of
this
State, as regards the treatment of
persons with Lyme disease, was indeed
influenced by the Insurance
Industry
(Edward Eisenberg, of Oxford Health, and
Donald Marks, Cigna, and also a member
of the board at UConn
Health
Center,
http://www.uchc.edu/bod/
I
demonstrated this link, in my
communications to Interpol and the UN
Human Rights Commission,
December
28, per the recommendation of Scotland
Yard. This racketeering complaint
involves also
Jeremy
Gray (Trinity College, Dublin), Susan
O’Connell (Southampton) of the EUCALB,
and Southampton
Labs, as
well as Aventis-Pasteur (the Connaught
Lyme vaccine, ImmuLyme), and of course
the Belgian
division
of SmithKline (now Glaxo-SmithKline),
EUCALB:
http://vie.dis.strath.ac.uk/vie/LymeEU/copyright.html
http://www.aldf.com/Disclaimer.asp
"The
American Lyme Disease Foundation, Inc. (ALDF)
and its representatives disclaim any
responsibility (including negligence)
from all consequences resulting from any
person acting, or
refraining from acting, on information
contained in this site."
"EUCALB
and its members disclaim any
responsibility (including in negligence)
for all consequences
of any
person acting on, or refraining from
acting in reliance on, information
contained in this site."
These are
clearly the same firm. I was told
Allen Steere started the EUCALB.
That would not be surprising, since
he
was the originator of the current and
bogus CDC testing criteria, the
Dressler/Steere IgG Western Blot, preceeded
by the much less sensitive
ELISA. The intention of this
two-tiered method is clear. The
ELISA, being much less
sensitive than a
Western Blot, is a means to screen out
Lyme disease, and often we hear of
Insurance companies not
paying for a
Western Blot, if the ELISA is negative.
The ELISA misses fully 80% of the cases
of Lyme borreliosis.
I
reported, with Rowland, as part of this
RICO complaint, Marc S. Ryan (Office of
Policy and Management), as well
as the
State’s Epidemiologist, Matthew Cartter,
several members of the UCONN Health
Center, the CT Department
of Heath, CT
Children’s Medical Center, (Larry Zemel,
Henry Feder, Michael Gerber, Kaplan,
etc…)
As many
of you know, Attorney General Blumenthal
had a hearing on the mistreatment of
Lyme patients by Insurance
companies.
http://www.cslib.org/attygenl/health/lyme.htm
The next
Blumenthal Hearing on Lyme disease is
Jan 29, 2004, and here is that
announcement:
http://www.cslib.org/attygenl/mainlinks/tabindex19.htm
There is
also the issue of Lyme-treating
physician harassment by Medical Boards
in many states, brought about by
members
of the American Lyme disease Foundation
and their association with Managed Care,
CastleConnolly.com,
John Connolly,
who was one of the original
“entrepreneurial trio” with Durland
Fish, and Gary Wormser, who founded
this
farce of a non-profit organization, The
American Lyme Disease Foundation
(ALDF.com).
More
interesting, still, as regards the
corruption in this State, is the DMHAS.
Recent news regarding deaths in
Trevellian’s Jails:
http://www.state.ct.us/opapd/
Investigation Report On the Death of JB
State of Connecticut, Office of
Protection and Advocacy ,
for Persons with Disabilities,
James D. McGaughey, Executive Director,
Susan Werboff, Program Director,
Protection and Advocacy for Individuals
with Mental Illness (PAIMI) Program,
Anne Broadhurst, Principal Investigator,
April
11, 2003
The Investigation Report on the Death of
JB reflects the results of an
investigation conducted by our Office’s
Protection and Advocacy for Individuals
with Mental Illness (PAIMI) program into
the circumstances surrounding the death
of J.B., a patient at the Whiting
Forensic Division of Connecticut Valley
Hospital.
J.B.
died of cardiorespiratory arrest
associated with being restrained.
The investigation found that signs he
was experiencing a medical emergency
were interpreted by facility staff as
evidence of attempts at behavioral
manipulation on his part, and, further,
that legal requirements and policy
safeguards surrounding the use of
restraints were not observed. It
also found that other aspects of J.B.’s
treatment reflected misunderstandings of
his identity and needs.
Our
Office shares this report with the hope
that those engaged in the work of
behavioral health care will consider
ways to prevent similar tragedies from
occurring.
James D. McGaughey, Executive Director
Ths only problem is, Kenneth Marcus,
Medical Director of the DMHAS would
prefer we did not know more about these
deaths in CT’s Trevellian’s Jails
http://vvv.dmhas.state.ct.us/oocmessage/archive2001/3.22.01.htm
(DHMAS
HIDING THE BODIES)
http://www.dmhas.state.ct.us/news/letters/5.20.02.html
The
following editorial appeared in The New
London Day on May 17, 2002. The
editorial is followed by a response
(Letter to the Editor) from Ken Marcus,
M.D., DMHAS Medical Director.
EDITORIAL
Burying its secrets, again
For
proof that the state confidentiality law
allows the bureaucracy to bury its
mistakes, consider this: even a state
patient-advocacy office can't get all
the details it needs to evaluate two
patient deaths that occurred in
state-run facilities. Why? Because the
state Department of Mental Health and
Addiction Services (DMHAS) says state
officials can't have those details,
that's why. Such information, the
department says, is secret under the
state confidentiality law.
Rose
Marie Cinami and James Bell both died
while in state-run institutions. Ms.
Cinami choked on food during breakfast
at Cedarcrest Hospital in Newington. Mr.
Bell died while being restrained by
staff members at Whiting Forensic
Division of Connecticut Valley Hospital
in Middletown. Asking whether or not the
state is culpable in those deaths is not
simply good public policy; it's a moral
imperative. For the sake of the patients
and the public, it is necessary to have
all the facts in order to determine what
steps can be taken to prevent such
deaths in the future.
But
DMHAS says no.
Because
of that, the Office of Protection and
Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities
is forced to go to federal court to find
out all the circumstances behind the
patients' deaths. The office wants to
know whether staff abuse or neglect was
a factor in those deaths. It seeks the
records of the peer review that took
place after the patients' deaths. That
is a meeting at which medical personnel
assess performance of their peers. The
office has been forced to file suit in
federal court, saying the denial of
records violates federal laws. Anyone
who believes, as The Day does, that such
confidentiality laws can be potentially
dangerous in an open society will wish
the office godspeed in its quest.
This is
not the first, nor will it be the last
time, that the state bureaucracy
stiff-armed those seeking reasonable
information on suspicious deaths of
people staying in state institutions.
It's far more common for state officials
to turn a deaf ear to requests for
information about the background of
people who have committed a crime or who
are considered a threat while in state
care. All the silence, all the secrecy
is justified under the rubric of
protecting privacy, whether or not the
public or patients themselves are at
risk.
Confidentiality has become a convenient
facade to hide mistakes and protect the
careers of those who make the mistakes.
It shouldn't be tolerated, not for a
moment. State lawmakers should amend the
confidentiality law so that it doesn't
put the public at risk or compromise
necessary review of patient treatment �
as it is doing in these latest cases.
DMHAS
RESPONSE FROM KEN
MARCUS, M.D., DMAHS
MEDICAL DIRECTOR
May 20,
2002 , Letter
to the Editor:
As Medical
Director for the Department of Mental
Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS), I
feel compelled to respond to the
editorial that appeared in The Day on
May 17, 2002, entitled "Burying its
secrets, again." The editorial
references a suit recently filed in
federal court under which the state's
Office of Protection and Advocacy for
People with Disabilities (OPA) seeks to
obtain access to peer review records
that resulted from internal
investigations into the separate deaths
of two patients in state hospitals.
The Day editorial makes the claim that
"Confidentiality has become a convenient
fa�ade to hide mistakes and protect the
careers of those who make the mistakes."
We disagree with this characterization,
believe it is unfair, and are concerned
that it may disparage healthcare workers
who devote their lives to helping people
with disabilities. Nevertheless,
we support the principle under which The
Day has brought the issue to the
attention of Connecticut citizens.
First,
let's look at the facts. Upon
request by OPA, the department, as
required by federal law, provided
complete copies of all medical and
psychiatric records of the two patients
identified in the OPA federal lawsuit.
DMHAS further complied with appropriate
requests from OPA to examine progress
notes and to interview the doctors and
other staff who treated these patients.
DMHAS cooperated fully with OPA in
accordance with applicable federal and
Connecticut state law. However,
DMHAS did not comply with OPA's request
that we provide a copy of peer review
investigation records that are protected
from disclosure by Connecticut state
law. The Office of Protection and
Advocacy contends that they can have
access to peer review records. The
Department of Mental Health and
Addiction Services believes that to
grant access violates Connecticut state
law. It should be noted that
access to peer review records is not
just an issue for state-operated
hospitals; the same prohibitions against
disclosure apply to all hospitals in
Connecticut. Indeed, according to
the American Medical Association, nearly
every hospital in the nation conducts
peer review investigations that are
protected by law from disclosure.
It is the differing interpretation of
state and federal law that requires the
issue to be decided by a federal court.
Peer
review is a process that occurs
following a critical incident in a
hospital, such as the untimely death of
a patient. The process is defined
in the medical staff by-laws of the
hospital and provides for a no-holds
barred examination of an incident and
the quality of patient care. In
DMHAS facilities, these same medical
staff by-laws also permit the Chief
Executive Officer or the hospital's
medical leadership to summarily suspend
or revoke all or part of a doctor's
ability to practice medicine in the
facility if the doctor's actions are
believed to represent a threat to the
patient health and safety. Should
the need arise such actions can be taken
at any time, regardless of whether a
peer review investigation is being
conducted.
In order
to ensure that nothing is withheld
during peer review investigations, state
laws prevent disclosure of the peer
review findings so that participants
will speak candidly without fear that
their statements will be used as
evidence in civil litigation that might
arise from the case. Findings
cannot be disclosed even when the review
concludes that there were no problems
with medical practice.
In a
recent federal district court case the
American Medical Association (AMA) and
the Federation of American Hospitals
argued that making peer review
investigations public would "effectively
eviscerate the institution of peer
review."
DMHAS,
like other healthcare providers in
Connecticut, is deeply committed to
providing the best quality care that can
be achieved. Anything that acts as
a barrier to quality care is
fundamentally unacceptable. As we
strive to improve care it is important
that we have among our tools a process
that allows for a thorough and vigorous
examination of critical incidents.
The Day has concluded that public
disclosure of the findings of these
investigations is paramount. We
question whether the abridgement of peer
review protections will achieve this
goal. Instead, we fear it may
eliminate an important tool for
continuing to improve the quality of
care.
---Kenneth Marcus, M.D., Medical
Director, Department of Mental Health
and Addiction Services
Dr. Marcus would prefer we did not know
about what goes on in these places.
This is the same character who came down
from Hartford in an emergency to assist
with the DCF’s getting rid of me, by
declaring I was insane, psychotic, and
dangerously intelligent, for filing discrimation and ethics complaints to
the Commission
on Human Rights, and the
Statewide Bar Counsel, vowing to get
these outrageous lying lawyers
disbarred, as a means to inhibit
the
harm that they do, via this
"callous and reckless indifference”.
Now my children are with Don Dickson,
but at least I am
not in jail or was
committed, although the State made
several attempts to do so. I was
compared to Ted Kasczinski, the
Unibomber, at the trial, if you can
imagine. Dangerous Intelligence?
Everyone knows being a human rights
activist and scientist, testifying at
the FDA, and leading a campaign to get
Vaccine
Adverse Events reported, as
regards LymeRIX, starting ActionLyme
International Patient Advocacy Group,
and being out
in front advocating for my
children all these years predicts I will
become the next Unibomber, or suddenly
violent to my
children and drive them
into a lake, as the DCF purports.
These things happen commonly -- in
the imaginations of Dangerous
Imaginations and Dangerous
“Intelligence” of the CT DCF and
Psychiatry, at Large.
I also filed
a RICO complaint, named several members
of the State’s Bureaucracy, and because
I am an analytical chemist,
who was
seriously mistreated for Lyme, by
Psychiatry, despite my own
recommendations from experience and
familiarity with
how this delirium state
of Lyme Neuroborreliosis be treated
(ProVigil for alertness), have studied
the brain damage of the compounded neurotoxicity of the wrong treatment for
borreliosis, and wrote a summary/bibiolograpthy
of the reference,
especially this one:
J
Forensic Sci. 2003 Jan;48(1):187-9,
Neuroleptic-induced akathisia and
violence: a review
Leong
GB, Silva JA., Center for Forensic
Services, Western State Hospital,
Tacoma, WA 98498-7213, USA. leonggb@dshs.wa.gov
”Surprisingly, the association of
neuroleptic-induced akathisia and
aggressive behavior was not formally
recognized until nearly two and one-half
decades of antipsychotic prescribing had
passed. Using a search of the
anglophonic literature, this phenomenon
is reviewed. Advances in
psychopharmacology have reduced
neuroleptic-induced akathisia and hold
promise to eliminate it altogether.
Nonetheless, important clinical and forensic aspects of
neuroleptic-induced akathisia and
aggression remain and are explored.
PMID: 12570226 [PubMed - indexed for
MEDLINE]”
This
happens to coincide with what we know
about the knowns and unknowns of
psychotropic drugging of children and
the bad outcomes (Columbine, would be a
recent example). In addition,
there were several articles in the lay
media, even
recently on CNN, and TIME
magazine as regards Ritalin and others.
In the article above regarding
“Whose fault is it?”, if psychotropics
are so brain-damaging as to make matters
worse, of course, we will never hear
from Psychiatry first and
admitting to
this damage. Most have no
clue as to what are the drugs’
mechanisms of damage nor clearly would
they care.
I suspect Marcus does,
however, understand
Psychotropic-induced brain damage, as
does Peter Breggin
(www.breggin.com,
and
www.ICSPP.org ) since Marcus
saw my list of published journal
articles demonstrating this
brain
damage.
http://www.actionlyme.com/actionlyme_children_with_lyme_di.htm
“November 19, 2003
TO: Dr.
Laura Lustig, The Learning Center,
Westport, CT 1200 Post Road, Westport,
CT 06880” …..
The list
of references of psychotropics-induced
brain damage is there, and they were
given to Lustig in full text, on
November 20, 2003. On November 21,
the DCF decided to kidnap my children,
and on November 26, they did so.
Clearly this frightened the DCF,
Patricia Leebens, and Kenneth Marcus so
much that I had to be declared
“dangerously intelligent.”
That is
true- I am dangerous to “Psychiatry”
because I am a pharmaceutical chemist
and I advocate for the preservation of
life and especially the minds of
children.. All psychotropics are
brain damaging with the possible
exception of Lithium, which you can also
read about on my website. It
happens to be true that the mechanisms
of all other psychotropics change brain
chemistry, via the regulation of
receptor profile, and it also happens to
be true the the exact mechanism of
extrapyramidal effects (the term
Psychiatrists use which means brain
damage), is similar to the brain damage
in Lyme borreliosis, and other
encephalopathies- the toxic-metabolic
effect. It is also true, that one
should never see a Psychiatrist
unwilling to learn about borreliosis,
when one is also a victim of child
abuse. It is also true that
Psychiatrists who report that DSM-labelling
of patients inhibits “care” and is
generally worthless, easily fall into
the same trap they have identified
themselves:
http://philo.8m.com/phillips.html
“In
concluding this review I would like to
summarize what I consider the major
features of a hermeneutic orientation in
psychiatry. (1) A hermeneutic approach
will focus on those conditions, and
those aspects of any condition, that
call for an interpretation of the
meaning structures that play a
significant role in the condition. It
will also evince a sensitivity to the
boundaries between meaning-oriented and
other explanatory modalities. (2) This
approach will emphasize the historicity
of any theoretical point of view, any
diagnostic system, and any therapeutic
modality in psychiatry. This involves a
recognition that there is no value-free
or presuppositionless orientation in
this field. One of the challenges of the
hermeneutic effort is to promote
"conversation" among the differing
approaches, both at theoretical level
and at the level of treatment of the
individual patient. (3) The hermeneutic
approach will subordinate the universal
to the particular--that is, theory takes
second place to the understanding and
care of the individual patient.
Psychiatric knowledge is thus practical
and organized for treatment of the
individual patient. (4) Finally, as a
practical discipline, directed toward
the care of the individual patient and
allowing an inevitable plurality of
perspectives in the provision of that
care, psychiatric knowledge is finite,
limited, and subject to ongoing
revision.”—James Phillips.
Why
there are similarities in presentation
(palsy, Parkinson’s agitation), between
toxic-metabolic Encephalopathies has
been discovered to be simply a function,
of gravity, as was shown by contrast
imaging. These toxins pool at the
base of the brain, increasing in
concentration, and therefore damage.
There is of course plenty of toxic
damage at the cellular level.
This is
meant to be a word of caution, to pay
attention to the lay media, as slowly
but surely these concepts are being
revealed, and far be it from Marcus, and
people like him, in fact the entire
genre, of this farce of a Medical
Practice, Psychiatry, to protect
anything other than their salary, and
the news about how people die under
their “care.”
This is
Connecticut.
Land of Abuse and Incompetence.
The fact
of Psychiatry, is available. There
are proven, demonstrated ways to improve
the damage of child abuse without the
retro-therapeutic means of brain damage
on top of brain damage even in a
non-organic brain damaged state, and
those methods are offered again by the
very same people who actually consider,
improving outcomes, The Sidran
Institute’s experts such as, van der
Kolk, whose data I also copied in full
text to Laura Lustig. Far be it
for those who prostitute themselves for
the State, such as the entire agency of
the DCF, and DMHAS, and Laura Lustig of
the “New Learning Center” to consider
real care.
http://www.sidran.org/index.html
Those are my
recommendations to The Child Advocate,
as well as any “mental health” workers
and in related fields such as education.
I strongly UNRECOMMEND anyone refer to
the Department of Children and Families
if they suspect Child Abuse or Neglect,
until we see this change indeed, Dr.
Sirry envisions. I don’t think
that is going to happen until after
these indictments of the new Trevellian,
John G. Rowland and crew finish that
march to prison, and of course, we have
success with this racketeering complaint
as regards Lyme disease and the
Insurance companies, and whatever it is
that goes on in the minds of people like
Edward McSweegan and Durland Fish, who
you saw, conspired to destroy the
integrity of the Lyme disease
Foundation.
McSweegan and Fish would prefer people
GET this permanent brain infection, and
the associated brain damage, and then
the subsequent abuse of the “Mental
Health” System in CT, as you can see in
their 1995 email correspondence
(included). I recommend not taking
any news from the American Psychiatric
Association (APA) to be factual.
The Devil is always in the Details.
And
maybe I SHOULD go to these
Psychiatric Hospitals and others of John
G. Trevellian’s jails. It sounds
to me from my experience with Marcus,
the DMHAS, the DCF, Leebens, Phillips,
and the APA that there are MANY
souls crying out for mercy. Those
who have been charged with care, have
done more harm than good. They
refuse to recognize and abstain from
knowingly aggravating severe trauma
results. Maybe we all are
obliged, now, to take a closer
look.
That’s
my update. I get to see my kids
soon. I don’t know when. I have to
be “supervised” by these DCF “workers”.
In their abundant imaginations (“callous
and reckless indifference”), the
DHMAS and DCF “erred”. I never had
any intention of doing what they do,
including Marcus, who can then hide the
bodies.
(I don’t
know if I mentioned yet another suicide
in Don Dickson’s family. Child
Abuse. His nephew Evan Wayne
(Arizona), who was about 22, killed
himself a few days before Christmas,
2003. I KNOW
this family. They have some inborn
hatred, a penchant for relentless abuse,
and daily emotional torture à
Donald G. Dickson’s family.)
Kathleen
M. Dickson