Does anyone care if they have
-burgdorferi or -outer mongolii
-frenchfrii or -barbouri
Charging the Lyme RICO in 5 Points
BACKGROUND: Go to MedLine and look up Borrelia in the taxonomy database.
How many borrelia are there?
there and read all the reports associated with how they categorize
Borreliae. You will see that all these spirochetes are differentiated
by flagellin. That means this is how they should all be tested for- a
test developed by Yale in 1991 and patented in 1993. The specific
antibodies to all Borrelial flagellins should be the only
antibody test for Relapsing Fever in America.
Note that by ignoring all these other borrelia is a technique of the
negative data rule.
Phylogeny This report is
no longer available free-full text on the Taxonomy database. I
recommend reading this one and the one by Picken.
Flagellin Master Prober: Picken, 1992:
Burgdorferi is most similar to hermsii
CHARGING THE RICO- 5 SIMPLE ARGUMENTS:
You will see that this will end up as homicide charges against Yale,
over their scientifically valid test, US Patent 5,618,533.
FALSE CLAIMS ACT CASE
AGAINST THE INSURANCE BIGS, because they deploy psychiatrists to deny us
disability income ("psychological evaluations"), because the Long Term Disability
Carriers do not pay Long Term Disability for a diagnosis of "CRAZY."
And this is weird because I told Yale's
James Phillips all about this
abuse, and then he turned around and did it himself to shield himself
from a malpractice lawsuit, since he really is that much of a
moron. I gave him all of mine and my congenitally infected Lyme children's medical records in the Summer
of 2000, and explained that Lyme and Yale were a problem for us.
You can see that all of the
dates and the records jive,
because that's what happens when people are telling the truth.
1) WHAT IS SCIENTIFIC
VALIDITY? HOW DOES IT APPLY TO
CASE DEFINITION (a false claim to the United States Government) (and
LYMErix), AND WERE THE CROOKS AWARE OF IT? This section of the charges is to include the
Primers Shell Game.
2) BIOMARKERS OF DISEASE- PUBLISHED BY THE CROOKS (this is to
include the 1989 IDSA Reviews, and the known ALS and MS and Lupus outcomes of testing negative
to the Dearborn criteria)...
3) ...WHO TURNED AROUND AND DID NOT USE THESE MARKERS IN THE KLEMPNER STUDY
AND INSTEAD CALLED US CRAZY, AS THEY DID WITH THE GULF WAR ILLNESS VETERANS.
STALKING, ANONYMOUS INTERNET HARASSMENT, LIBEL, ETC; AB-USE OF OR
PSYCHIATRISTS who never run any scientifically valid tests and are allowed to guess;
This is scientific fraud with intent to cause harm.
As you can see,
even if a person has a "co" psychiatric disorder with their delirium, they
are to be treated medically first.
So, no matter how you look at it, this
is scientific fraud with intent to cause harm:
If denied real medical care
for a real disease by falsely declaring a sick person to be a hypochondriac,
that is malpractice in that it denies them real medical care for a real
If given psychotropics for a real medical
condition, this is doubly brain damaging, according to the American
Psychiatric Association's own guidelines on the treatment of a delirium.
It is doubly brain damaging, and double malpractice for the crooks to deploy
psychiatrists and psychotropics, especially since we know they know
otherwise, because the crooks are themselves the discoverers of the scientifically valid markers of
brain and nerve destruction caused by Lyme Borreliosis alone.
Psychiatry, is just set up that way
- these idiots never entertain testing for any scientifically valid
diseases, nor do they mention that there is no such scientific thing as CFIDS and FM, because to reveal that these diseases need to be worked up
SCIENTIFICALLY, would end millions in grants for the psychiatrists who abuse
them with ever- new theories as to the victims motivations for claiming
they're sick. Psychiatrists are well-known by the Bigs, to be complete
and total idiots.
The APA is not likely to renounce their guidelines just to protect
James Phillips (88 Noble Ave.,
Milford, CT) from being charged criminally when this overall crime is
charged as mass homicide. Phillips was given much of this data and
knew about the crime. Or, at least he pretended to understand it,
which may be even a worse moral crime- one that everyone should look out
for: psychiatrists pretending to understand what you're saying.
4) THE PATENTS TELL A DIFFERENT STORY
than what IDSA now says.
5) THE PERSISTENCE DATA- PUBLISHED BY THE CROOKS, THEMSELVES, AND ABOUT WHICH THEY WERE CAUGHT LYING, NUMEROUS TIMES, AND NOW IN
the movie "UNDER OUR SKIN-"
which we know they now regret participating in.
THESE FIVE MAIN POINTS MAKE THE CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT of False
Claims or Qui Tam and Mass Murder (not negligent homicide and not
because we have clearly proven INTENT to cause harm).
Then there's the proof of very vicious
deliberateness to cover up their crimes by falsely
accusing, slandering, stalking, malpractice, wiretapping, libeling,
theft of mail, frauds upon the court, and perjuring against the victims of
McSweegan Harassment, MainPage
Hartford Courant story from 1997 about LDF's
harassment by Edward McSweegan
"Bogus Articles" and setting people (LDF)
up to later call them crazy
Anonymous Internet Harassment and Stalking-
as re sic-ing the Child
Protective Morons against Lyme victims.
The Harassment of Rosie O'Donnell
and her kids re Lyme (I now
think this Frank90222 @ aol.com character, who later became
Chuck P Adams, is Durland Fish)
(wiretapping the Lyme Disease Foundation and stating
at the depositions that McSweegan learned his dirt on the LDF due to
"clairvoyance" or "wishful thinking.")
SWEEG_WATCH - There is no doubt McSweegan is obsessed
Lyme victims. This whole Quackwatch page shows he's furious at
people like me who exposed the LYMErix crime to the FDA
(more slander and libel)
Janice Beers as one of Sweeg's victims.
these people Sweeg mentions are the very people he, himself stalked
and slandered and otherwise persecuted.
Durland Fish is caught with a "hit list" by the Hartford
Courant, and in the same paragraph proves he is completely insane like the Neocons:
Durland Fish- Hilarious Courant Interview
Anonymous Internet Disinformation Campaign
"Anonymous Internet Disinformation
Campaign Using a Remailer"
What a coincidence: "Chuck
P Adams," and the famous hero of NIH's
Edward McSweegan's stupid and unsophisticated novel (that we
for while he was doing nothing at the NIH) is named "ChristoPher
McSweegan Calling Europeans "STUPID"
Calling the US Navy, STUPID and INCOMPETENT
McSweegan Calling the FBI STUPID and
(However, I would have to agree with him on that)
"The Man With No Work" - On TV (CBS NEws)
and in the national newspapers, McSweegan trashes his
employer, the NIH
Posting as fake Lyme victims
"I hear [Edward McSweegan] is hung like a horse
AHHHH" -Pretending to be JWissmille
posting as JWismille
@ aol, when "Chuck" (Durland Fish,
probably) discusses McSweegan's penis trip to Akademgorodok, SIBERIA, RUSSIA.
See all the posts under the same fake
"georgia" (Wissmiller) name - he is clearly obsessed with me
Is this appropriate for either a
Yale entomologist or an NIH microbiologist? Is this
behavior the reason why this cabal lost a billion dollars
worth of grant handouts in the past 8 months? (400
million from the NIH and 600 million from the Howard Hughes
Nancy+gulp+slurp+ The "BLOW
JOB" Libel against
Berntsen and Dr. Steve Phillips, Ridgefield
to New Haven (Durland Fish)
Locates to Crofton Maryland (McSweegan's other home)
tells me not to "mess with the Federal govt and Yale"
mess" IP locates to New Haven
McSweegan's Anonymous Internet Harassment
of myself after my
FDA presentation on LYMErix
Perjury, James Phillips and Kenneth Marcus over
what the APA's
Upon the Court," Yale's Patricia
Leebens defrauds the
court and then "leaves the country" so she can't be cross-examined
(are these people low-lives or what?)
Justice by DCF regarding Congenital Lyme
Stealing Richard Blumenthal's RICO mail
off of his desk and giving it
to Yale's James Phillips and the former Yalie, Kenneth Marcus, the
incompetent head of CVH who is dangerously incompetent and
needs to be committed,
according to the United States Department
is a "fraud upon the court" and mail theft, in addition to
perjury and malpractice.
Yale's James Phillips (88 Noble Ave,
Milford, Corrupticut) was
given all the proof that I have this disease, gave it to my children, that I
was treated with 3.5 months of IV ceftriaxone, got 100% better, but relapsed
as my brain SPECT scans show and as I told the CT Attorney General in his
first Lyme hearing in 1999.
James Phillips perjured himself to avoid a very
winnable malpractice lawsuit, making him the
world's biggest hypocrite,
because he also pretends to be a religious person and philosopher -
being a complete and total sex-obsessed pervert in private (God as my
Phillips is a Freudian pervert and 100% obsessed with sex to the exclusion
of all other topics),
but also pretends to be a
philosopher- despite what happened to his buddy Dr. Michael
Schwartz who established the AAPP
- TO WHICH JAMES PHILLIPS BELONGS - at the
hands of Allen
Is this guy, Phillips, the world's biggest puke
What kind of a woman could sleep with such an
abusive, low-life pervert? I bet his wife, Wendy
Stewart, does not
even know what kinds of things he says to his victims.
As you can see from my testimony at CT Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's 1999 Lyme
hearing, I improved 100% on 3.5 months of IV ceftriaxone after 9 years of the
living hell of Lyme disease:
(I start on page 336 of the actual .pdf file)
Since, I NEVER
◄The brain damage known as akathisia or psychomotor agitation-
the head of the Yale Psych Department's
very specialty The brain damage called akathisia = Bunney's "The Biology of Movement
Disorders") (Although Karen asked me not to publish it,
the Corrupticut State's Attorney's office did not do their job and prosecute the
guilty, here, Yale's despicable James Phillips and DCF's despicable AAG Jessica
Gauvin. No one here does their job.)
I recommend avoiding, completely, these
psychiatric pukes because they will
turn on you in a
heartbeat, and they always blame the victim.
Karen Forschner speaks about the
malpractice and brain damage:
- This is why (STEERE's HLAs) SmithKline was sued in two class actions over Yale's bogus
OspA vaccine. Allen Steere knows Lyme arthritis or acrodermatitis are
genetically-linked hypersensitivity reactions, or
allergy reactions, to OspA
or other Borrelial antigens, and therefore Steere's IgG antibody case
definition of Lyme does not
represent all manifestations of Borreliosis.
This, what Steere
did in Europe, or the Dearborn Result is the basis of all the FALSE CLAIMS made to the government in order to
get research grant money and
set up a
monopoly on blood (contains goodies like
bioweapons-insider data as well as new diseases to patent).
Mark Klempner made
a false claim to get a 4.7 million dollar grant- under the assumption that the
Case Definition was real or scientifically valid.
Dearborn Case Definition was Steere's False
Claim that Lyme was only a bad knee. He made these false
Europe in European journals, with bogus "high passage" strains
(G39/40 and FRG) and with the
premise that we look for the HIGHEST QUANTITY of something (antibodies) in
detect or "diagnose" it.
Arthur Weinstein published as second or a
back-up false claim that blot "objectivity" or higher
was a true characteristic of method validity.
That's why I call Weinstein the
And Lenny Sigal the
And Simon Wessely the
They're all experts at jerking off all over us.
FOUR TIMES, this criminal gang reported that they could not
read their Western Blots
in LYMErix vaccinated people, yet both gangs, the
Gary Wormser Gang, and the Robert Schoen
Gang, reported that they had
vaccines, despite not being able to tell whether or not LYMErix
Lyme. See the purple fonts, below. Those are the four
OspA, What's bad about it?
'Storing Spirochetes in rodent brains, Oscar Felsenfeld.
The crooks always use the mouse model of
brain infection, but that's not the
The Central RICO patents,
since the central RICO patent, owned by Dave Persing, goes with this Schoen
report (next) where Schoen and Persing demonstrate that they know which
primers to use to detect Lyme. This proper
DNA or RNA has never been
used to assay human patient treatment outcomes except where Gary Wormser in
showed that antibiotic treatment of a tick attachment failed to prevent
Lyme disease in 2/9 cases. (That was the only
exception.) These crooks
only use the proper DNA to detect spirochetes... when on their way to the
SCHOEN Yale and all the Lyme crooks know how to detect any kind of borreliosis and
This is also the RICO
report that went with the RICO
have known since the early 1990s: Use Borreliae-specific RNA or DNA
primers encoded on the chromosome
(and don't use any varying plasmid DNA, like
patent. This is the report where Yale's
Robert Schoen admits he could not read Western Blots in LYMErix
people and that he knew that in 1995, at least.
In this report - and this is the RICO report associated with the
main RICO patent
- Yale's Robert
Schoen demonstrates that they know how to diagnose any kind of
Lyme or borreliosis anywhere in the
Later (2002) Yale's Durland Fish demonstrated that he was aware of which
RNA primers to use when assessing treatment
outcomes in mice. These
primers have never been used in any human treatment trial outcomes except in Wormser's
experiments where he was assessing tick bites for Borrelia genetic
material after treatment (see data and links below in
Number 3) in 1992.
to see Schoen
instructing doctors in 1998 to blow off LYMErix injured persons while
at the same time revealing their plans for a monopoly on blood based on this
study and the amazing event
where OspA and B were left out of the diagnostic standard after Allen Steere
said Lyme Disease WAS a
disease of too many antibodies to OspA and B.
This is the central report that explains
the RICO monopoly because Persing EARLIER claimed this as a patent
because they admit they can't read their Western Blots in LYMErix-vaccinated
people due to the blot
The CENTRAL RICO patent, Dave
RICO Patents Movie Autoplays here
Monopoly Patent on testing and LYMErix
Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD Patent-6,045,804
Note the date on the patent.
"The present invention
provides a method useful to detect a B. burgdorferi infection in a
The method provided by the invention is particularly useful to discriminate
burgdorferi infection from OspA vaccination, although it is sufficiently
specific to use in any general Lyme disease screening or
diagnostic application. Thus, the
method of the invention is particularly
appropriate for large scale screening or
diagnostic applications where only
part of the subject population has been vaccinated
or where the vaccination
status of the population is unknown. "
(Or, appropriate for a
monopoly on vaccines and testing to go to Imugen and Yale's L2
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920 Everyone in
the world ought to read this full text report,
because it seems like what I told
the vaccine committee was more true than I even knew at the time about LYMErix
appearing to activate latent infection in people who had Lyme previously and
believed they had recovered. I was just
observing the empirical data (the
victims of LYMErix called me, very ill, looking for help)
4) Dave Persing and Lenny
Sigal on the BLOT SMUDGING
- Unreadable blots in OspA vaccinated people, alleviated by using
a strain of Bb with no OspA-B plasmid in it. Here
Persing is talking about
LYMErix, when in fact, his co-author, Lenny Sigal ran the ImmuLyme trial, did
not report blot
smudging, and Persing already knew about the blot smudging since
that's the RICO patent that Persing developed with
Schoen and the reason OspA
and B were left out of the diagnostic standard!! See 1) above for the
journal report that goes
with the Persing RICO patent.
Here is proof that
Gary Wormser knows that the current (Dearborn
IgG) testing for Lyme
only detects 9 of 59 patients tested positive
according to Steere's IgG criteria:
(9/59) = 15% ??
Read carefully what Wormser says in this report:
Wormser says he is assessing Steere's IgG
recommendation for the CDC to adopt (Dearborn), and that it was
NO GOOD. Yet it was
adopted by the CDC anyway.
Who approved this standard, even though none
the labs agreed?
For Wormser to report in the IDSA guidelines that one has to have a positive
test for Lyme, means he has
published scientific fraud. Similarly, CDC
says their testing for Lyme is "valid," when it is hardly valid, if only
cases of Lyme are indentified by IgG.
As I told the FDA 6 (now, 10) years ago,
the testing for Lyme is deliberately bogus, and
none among the invited (to the 1994
Dearborn Conference) labs agreed with
Steere's way to diagnose Lyme...
Imugen Labs, Norwood, MA at Dearborn Conference says Steere's IgG criteria
misses 86% of the cases (is 14%
Wisconsin: Steere's method misses 78% of the
Igenex's report for Dearborn: The CDC's IgG Lyme test is only at best, 25% accurate
PRIMERS SHELL GAME PLAYED BY GARY WORMSER:
A) New York Medical College, the ID Society, and
the ALDF dot com's Gary Wormser and the CDC report that 1/3 of
seronegative. And in this report, they also note 1) which primers are to be
used - which have never been used
to assess patients in treatment outcomes
except for 2) here, where Wormser shows that 2/9 persons treated with a dose of
antibiotics were still PCR
Go to the report to see which primers they used, and who participated in this
1992 study. You will see that Wormser
reported that 2/9 persons treated
for tick bite, were still positive for spirochetes. That's pretty
damned criminal, since
Wormser now recommends not to treat on tick bite, AFTER
they said TO treat on tick bite AFTER they said NOT to
treat on tick bite,
since Yale wanted to have a bogus LYMErix trial.
Which is why
Sweeg and Durly harassed the
'See how incredibly stupid the
Corrupticut US Attorney's office is? Any one of these individual crimes,
is worthy of prosecution.
Here are three published journal articles,
including 2 by Yale and
one by Allen Steere, which show that
Lyme congenitally confers:
The Lyme and LYMErix RICO Patents -
write down the patents to verify independently or go
Monopoly was set up around Yale's bogus LYMErix (OspA) vaccine.
Steere left OspA out of the CDC's
standard because they (L2 Diagnostics and Imugen Labs) were
going to be the only
labs licensed to use the patented test using an OspA-B less spirochete.
was necessary because OspA-B in the bug resulted in unreadable Western
Blots. Yale never told the FDA that they could
not read their Western
Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people, so they simply lied to the FDA about LYMERix's efficacy
and deliberately did not report adverse events.
the money- this was the biggest medical crime in the history of modern medicine.
It was a
completely bogus vaccine and is a completely bogus description of what
Lyme really is.
Here is Yale
discussing how they could not read their Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated
people in 1996, but they did
not stop the vaccine trial, because they clearly
knew about it much earlier: