Yale University is fully aware of the valid testing parameters for the assessment of anyone

Psychiatry is too stupid to realize that if you perform scientifically valid rule outs and find markers of compromise, their own rules say you can't diagnose a psychiatric disorder.    Indices of Pathology

Department of Children and Families Citizen’s Review Board 12 April 06
House Ways and Means 12 April 2006
How DCF could improve Citizens Review- DCF are criminally insane

Yale University is fully aware (see below) of the valid testing parameters for the assessment of anyone, not just juveniles on death row in Texas, as you can see, below. But does Yale Forensic Psychiatry or Yales's and DCF's Patricia Leebens or anyone at DMHAS or DCF perform these valid assessments?   No.   Leebens would be out of a job, since she is the chief drug-pusher and brain damager of children for the DCF. She will rot in hell, and she knows it.    DMHAS's Joseph More told me it would be too expensive.   That is not true. It would mean a lot of them would lose their nonsense jobs, and they would have to be replaced with more competent staff.

VALID = Genetic, Traumatic, and Organic parameters ONLY.   Here is Yale demonstrating that they are fully aware of what is a valid mental health assessment:

See also: My lawsuit against the State and Yale You'll be convinced psychiatrists are crazy.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(4):408-29.
Related Articles, Links

Ethics questions raised by the neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological, educational, developmental, and family characteristics of 18 juveniles awaiting execution in Texas.

Lewis DO, Yeager CA, Blake P, Bard B, Strenziok M.

Yale University Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, USA. dorothy.lewis@yale.edu

Eighteen males condemned to death in Texas for homicides committed prior to the defendants' 18th birthdays received systematic psychiatric, neurologic, neuropsychological, and educational assessments, and all available medical, psychological, educational, social, and family data were reviewed. Six subjects began life with potentially compromised central nervous system (CNS) function (e.g., prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome). All but one experienced serious head traumas in childhood and adolescence. All subjects evaluated neurologically and neuropsychologically had signs of prefrontal cortical dysfunction. Neuropsychological testing was more sensitive to executive dysfunction than neurologic examination. Fifteen (83%) had signs, symptoms, and histories consistent with bipolar spectrum, schizoaffective spectrum, or hypomanic disorders. Two subjects were intellectually limited, and one suffered from parasomnias and dissociation. All but one came from extremely violent and/or abusive families in which mental illness was prevalent in multiple generations. Implications regarding the ethics involved in matters of culpability and mitigation are considered.

PMID: 15704627 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]