04/26/2013 04:54:08
Cryme Trainer (moved)
Non-HLA-linked Diseases
Hurricane Sandy and Mold-Related
illnesses (like LYMErix and Lyme Disease, and CFIDS/FM).
=======
References for psychotropics-induced brain damage
Older data on the incurability of Relapsing Fever
1986, McSweegan trashes Navy for $$$ for ALDF.com
1988, Dattwyler & about immune-suppressing, seronegative Lyme
1990, CDC: "Diagnose Lyme as if it was Relapsing Fever."
Allen Steere "NeuroLyme won't test positive," 1990.
1992, CDC officer Allen Steere falsifies testing in Europe
1992, CDC patents with SmithKline show 2 kinds of Lyme
Compare the 2 kinds of Lyme in the RICO complaint
1994, CDC's Dearborn Booklet .pdf
CDC's invitation to participate in Dearborn .pdf
Evidence Lyme criminals knew LYMErix produced the same "multisystem disease" as "Chronic Lyme"
LYMErix Damage Coverup
(short)
1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow Saddam for the oil.
Bush/Gore Oil/War-(Oct,2000)
Bush's own explainer (Oct
2000) re:
Iraq Oil
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm (August, 2008; The crime initially described in person by Dickson to the New London Police and DCF, June, 2006)
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRIMES_OF_CORRUPTICUT.htm (Video of children saying Anderson sexually assaulted them)
http://www.actionlyme.org/ENTRAPMENT_DCF_CHILD_ABUSE.htm (Audiofile of KMDickson phoning in complaint to DCF and evidence of DCF's Entrapment Operation, described in the Reply/Motion, below)http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE.htm June, 2006, saying the same things to DCF "court." about Anderson and copied to Governor Jodi Rell, who responded.
Anderson reopened this case after she lost her house and filed for bankruptcy, December, 2010. She could not afford her lifestyle if DCF stopped giving pediatric bodies to torture.
Docket Nos. KNL-CV-08-50082868
DICKSON, KATHLEEN vs ANDERSON, ANNETTE
Anderson, DCF’s Child Abuser Case vs : www.ActionLyme.org
CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT
70 Huntington Street
New London, CT
KNL-CV-08-5008286S
and
KNL-CV09-6001587S
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=KNLCV096001587S (Anderson Foreclosure)
May 4, 2011
MOTION TO DISMISS /ADA ACCOMMODATIONS
1) If PLAINTIFF ANDERSON was not guilty of the crimes about which the DEFENDANT DICKSON complained to the NEW LONDON POLICE and the CT DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (DCF) in June of 2006, ANDERSON would have sued MR. and MRS. PHILIP INKEL, who provided the evidence of ANDERSON’S crimes to the DEFENDANT DICKSON, immediately, in June of 2006 and who has his own website with the same complaints about PLAINTIFF ANDERSON as the DEFENDANT’S.
2) If ANDERSON was not guilty of abusing children in her “foster” “care” and therefore the DEFENDANT had made a false report to the NEW LONDON POLICE in June 2006, the DEFENDANT DICKSON would have been charged criminally at that time for making false statements to the NEW LONDON POLICE.
3) If the DEFENDANT DICKSON had made a false report to DCF about ANDERSON’S crimes in June of 2006, she would have been charged at that time by DCF for making a knowingly false complaint to DCF. The DCF instead lied-by-omission to JUDGE CARL TAYLOR [CORRECTION- JUDGE STUART BEAR] when they instead asked TAYLOR to issue an illegal gag order to the DEFENDANT DICKSON.Before DICKSON was served with the illegal gag order that DCF obtained from JUDGE TAYLOR by failing to mention to TAYLOR that DICKSON had contacted NEW LONDON POLICE in June, 2006, the hostile court-appointed attorney for another of MEREDITH INKEL’S children (biological mother of 3 children in PLAINTIFF ANDERSON’S care) , ATTORNEY VALERIE ALEXANDER (Groton, CT), requested of the DEFENDANT DICKSON that she send ALEXANDER data about the INKEL case that would be in violation of the un-served gag order on DICKSON.
This is known as an ENTRAPMENT operation that did not succeed, presumably because of the abundant evidence of PLAINTIFF ANDERSON’S abuse of the children on DEFENDANT DICKSON’S website, ActionLyme.org. [DEFENDANT DICKSON is the scientific whistleblower for the scientific fraud and racketeering complaint against YALE UNIVERSITY over “Lyme Disease,” filed with the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, New Haven, CT, District, in July, 2003, upon the referral of former ATTORNEY GENERAL (now SENATOR) RICHARD BLUMENTHAL’S staff lawyers. BLUMENTHAL later sued himself under CT “Anti-Trust” statutes.] DCF tried to arrest the DEFENDANT, not for “making false statements to DCF (a crime),” but in an effort to illegally silence her. DCF committed a FRAUD UPON THE COURT in their entrapment operation against DEFENDANT.
4) The complaint called in to DCF about ANDERSON about her violence to KIMBERLY GOSSELIN (aged 5 at the time), by GOSSELIN’S COUNSELOR, AMY SIZER, which was rated “Importance: High” by DCF, was made in 07/06/04 at 10:58 AM. That means in 2004, DCF had independent verification that children in ANDERSON’S care were treated violently and cruelly [the following document is already in Evidence in this case]:“Caller met with Kimberly for an individual therapy session this morning. Kimberly said she urinated in her pull-up this morning and the foster yelled at her. Caller said Kimberly has an ongoing issue with bedwetting which is being addressed.
”Kimberly told caller [AMY SIZER] that the foster mother [ANDERSON] has been smacking her in the head with an open hand. No marks or bruises. Kimberly told caller that foster mother does spank her on the behind. Kimberly said she is afraid of the foster mother when she gets angry. Kimberly had some fears returning to her foster home.
”Kimberly told caller she had lobster for dinner and threw it into the garbage. The foster mother took the lobster out of the garbage and made her eat it. No other specifics of the incident unknown [sic].
”Caller had her supervisor speak to Kimberly. Kimberly could not recall the last incident of foster mother hitting her. The foster mother does not threaten to harm Kimberly today. Kimberly was sent home with the foster mother. The foster mother is sometimes moody but she did not appear angry with Kimberly today….”
5) If ANDERSON was not guilty of the claims the DEFENDANT DICKSON made to DCF and the NEW LONDON POLICE, perhaps she would not be in FORECLOSURE and BANKRUPTCY perhaps as a result of not acquiring the abundant foster care income that likely sustained her, financially, in previous years (See Case No. KNL-CV09-6001587S in this same court)? Apparently DCF decided not to supply ANDERSON with pediatric bodies to feed the bank its mortgage payments, in recent years, resulting in foreclosure proceedings filed 10/08/09 – about a year after ANDERSON sued the DEFENDANT DICKSON. The latest decision listed – a declaration of bankruptcy by ANDERSON made by this same attorney, KENNETH LEARY - was filed 12/13/2010. ANDERSON’S ATTORNEY, LEARY, made no action on this claim against DICKSON from the summer of 2008 until FEBRUARY 17, 2011, 2 months, it appears, after ANDERSON lost her house and then filed for bankruptcy and nearly 5 years after DEFENDANT DICKSON complained about ANDERSON to the NEW LONDON POLICE and DCF (June 2006).
The attorney who is handling both of ANDERSON’S cases, this defamation case and ANDERSON’S foreclosure and bankruptcy cases, is KENNETH LEARY. DEFENDANT wonders if in her bankruptcy claims, ANDERSON and LEARY mentioned to the courts that she has this outstanding defamation case and an opportunity not to be in bankruptcy, despite the fact that the DEFENDANT DICKSON has zero equity in her house and owns no other property (no car, no refrigerator, no washing machine) of significant value and is on SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY for the MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS outcome of “LYME DISEASE.” (As well as Yale’s fake vaccine LYMErix - TLR2-agonist, OspA; See ACTIONLYME.ORG. Records are already in Evidence in this court, submitted August, 2008).
6) PLAINTIFF ANDERSON’S “boyfriend,” a “MR. MARIS” (phonetic) also tortured the children. DEFENDANT DICKSON wonders if MR. MARIS is a certified, trained foster parent, and had any legal right to perform “military-type” stress position tortures the children in ANDERSON’s “care,” described by the INKEL CHILDREN and attributed to ANDERSON’s “boyfriend,” “MR. MARIS.”
7) ANDERSON makes a false statement to this “court” in this suit by neglecting to mention that MR. PHILIP INKEL publically posts the same charges against ANDERSON in the newspapers (HARTFORD COURANT). This is a fraud upon the court.
As long as the DEFENDANT DICKSON has the approval of the INKEL FAMILY to report evidence of the violent abuse of their children and others people’s children, whose records were filed with INKEL DCF records – for whatever reason (apparently DCF was concerned enough about ANDERSON that DCF filed in the INKEL file this evidence that another child, Kimberly Gosselin and her “counselor” had complained about ANDERSON’S violence and abuse), the Evidence will remain on her website and elsewhere, as posted by MR. PHILIP INKEL, himself.
The PLAINTIFF ANDERSON must have some assurance that the jury and judge will not be allowed to see the Evidence already in Evidence with this “court” (videotape of the INKEL CHILDREN stating that ANDERSON “pinched” and “bit” their “pee-pees” and other physical records/documents). She would otherwise not dare to state falsely to the “court” in this lawsuit that DICKSON is lying about the abundant evidence of ANDERSON’S sexual and physical violence towards children, making this not a real “court,” and the DEFENDANT DICKSON, not even morally or legally obliged to answer it.
It is a moral duty to report violence against children to the “authorities.” But since in the case of CONNECTICUT, there are no authorities in any legal, moral or scientific matter, crimes against nature and human rights must be exposed internationally for the broader human community (everyone sane outside the UNITED STATES), so as to assure that no other emerging or third world states or nationalities endeavor to mimic this AMERICAN kind of “democracy.” That is, they should be posted on the internet (www.ActionLyme.org) for the whole world to see.
No one associated with the STATE of CONNECTICUT and especially CONNECTICUT’S self-alleged courts appears to be familiar with the concept of the FIRST AMENDMENT, the value of free speech, and how they relate to justice or protections of rights to liberty, person and property.
The secrecy of the DCF not about the “best interests of the children.” It is about what’s in the best interest of the criminal DCF and their severest abusers of children, like ANNETTE ANDERSON. DEFENDANT DICKSON will absolutely never remove the evidence of PLAINTIFF ANDERSON’S sexual and physical torture of children in her “care,” from PLAINTIFF’S website, ActionLyme.org, unless instructed to do so by MR. and MRS. INKEL or the CHILDREN themselves, when they come to age of maturity. Perhaps the INKEL children can one day have their DCF-Related-Traumas validated in a class action, like other well-known victims of such pedophile-class class actions.
DICKSON reported ANDERSON’S crimes to the NEW LONDON POLICE and DCF in June 2006 lawfully, truthfully, validly, with abundant evidence including the videotaped, unsolicited testimony of the children themselves (already in possession of this “court;” in Evidence), and in good faith. If these were not true - either the act of DEFENDANT DICKSON’S reporting of it to the NEW LONDON POLICE or the DCF, or the content and evidence provided in those reports - DEFENDANT DICKSON would certainly have already been charged criminally previous to this FRAUD UPON THE COURT by ANNETTE ANDERSON and her ATTORNEY, KENNETH LEARY.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, DEFENDANT DICKSON must be accommodated for disabilities related to the MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS version of “LYME DISEASE” (a scientific fraud and racketeering crime committed by Yale, et al - who were sued by SENATOR RICHARD BLUMENTHAL for “Anti-Trust”), and her documented verbal/auditory learning disability. All transactions and communications related to this trial if it is not dismissed will have to take place via videoconference due to DEFENDANT DICKSON’S physical disability, and the DEFENDANT requires the written transcripts of each day’s transactions completed before each stage of the trial for rebuttal or corrections to the record due to her “verbal/auditory-processing” disability rated as “Memory for verbal information is assessed … This results in an overall immediate memory performance that falls two statistical standard deviations below her age mates,” while “two dimensional block design is performed well, falling into the ‘very superior’ classification.” DEFENDANT-SCIENTIST-WHISTLEBLOWER DICKSON was also diagnosed by Dr. JAMES PHILLIPS as having high functioning autism. A 4+ standard deviation differential between verbal and visual IQ is the very definition of it. Five other blood relatives of the DEFENDANT DICKSON are affected with this genetic DIFFERENCE (Neurofibromatosis/Autism).
CERTIFICATION:
Faxed on 20110504 (May 4, 2011)
Superior Court
70 Huntington Street,
New London, CT
Fax 860-442-7703Kenneth A. Leary
165 State Street, Suite 405
New London, CT 06320
Fax 860-444-6879
Attorney for Plaintiff
---------------------------------------------------Pro-Se Defendant, Kathleen M. Dickson
23 Garden Street, 2nd Fl
Pawcatuck, CT 06379
CLASSIC HIGH FUNCTIONING AUTISM: (High Visual, Low Verbal IQ):
